While futurists were gathering in Washington, D.C. last week for a symposium sponsored by the Computer Science and Telecommunications Board on what’s next in the world of computer science and sociological change, an Italian imaging company Hal9000 released the largest digital photographic image ever recorded. The 8.6-gigabyte image – that’s 8.6 billion 0s and1s in a photographic frame – is not only a milestone it also indicates the speed in which cultural information now flows.
Composed of more than 1145 by 12.2 megapixel images, the giant image of Guadenzio Ferrari’s 1513 mural “Parete Guadenziana” pushes the optical boundaries of an informational/representational system that inhabits us.
Back in Washington scientists from an array of media-technology firms debated how technology is increasingly becoming more powerful and more pervasive. But the “science” there is another discussion underway. What lies beneath and beyond the tools and techniques people use to make things cheaper, faster, and easier?
Washington Post writer, Steve Lohr suggests:
“Future trends in computer imaging and storage will make it possible for a person, wearing a tiny digital device with a microphone and camera, to essentially record his or her life. The potential for communication, media and personal enrichment is striking.”
In terms of photojournalism, the larger conversation educators and professionals must engage in needs to include how humankind copes and adapts to the seemingly relentless challenges placed on its critical role within an informational system. Unfortunately, photojournalism, as an occupational group, has a history that has been to focus predominantly on the tools and techniques. Photojournalists depend on technologies that are interdependent, which in turn, creates an interconnected system of devices and skills associated with those devices.
Rudi Volti, in his 1995 book “Society and Technological Change”, points out, “The basic components of a technological system are not just material artifacts; human skills, organizational patterns, and attitudes are of equal importance.
All the criticism of photojournalism that came with professional lapses in ethical judgment involving photo-digital manipulation speaks directly to this issue. In a sense, technological innovation impinges upon professional standards because individual’s get swept up in thinking about and producing results. Instead of working to establish and maintain processes that help to ensure the authenticity, credibility, accuracy, integrity, honesty, and balance of a journalistic process, individuals find themselves obsessed with making images faster and cheaper.
Photojournalism has become an increasingly important player in a cultural information system – a structure that depends on a convention of learned signs. Photojournalism provides society with an immediate source of visual cues that support a structure mirroring its beliefs, values, attitudes, and prejudices. In other words images, especially news photographs, extract and abstract naturally occurring realities in order to construct new social realities. This shift from the natural to the culture is a result of our need for understanding the world through signs. A news photo, from this perspective, stands in for something outside the original occurrence.
As space and time contracts in our increasingly digitally-mediated universe, so do will our need for greater, cheaper, faster, and easier forms of visual information.